Yes, Scilex Holding Co is a real company. It’s a biopharmaceutical firm specializing in acquiring, developing, and commercializing non-opioid pain management products for acute and chronic pain. Key details include: • Headquarters: 960 San Antonio Road, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA. • Founded/Listed: Publicly traded on Nasdaq under the ticker SCLX since November 11, 2022. • Products: Their commercial product is ZTlido (lidocaine topical system) for postherpetic neuralgia. They’re also advancing candidates like SEMDEXA (SP-102), a triple-strength ZTlido (SP-103), and SP-104 (low-dose naltrexone). • Employees: Approximately 31. • Website: scilexholding.com. This information is based on current financial market data as of November 2025.

---

They won’t - Congress ceded power to the executive and can take it back (but that means they need to actually do something). The Supreme Court will say that it has no business impeding the agreements between the other two, co-equal, branches of government

---

LMAO, fake meat co. just delayed their earnings for a week and rug pulled the remaining bag holders 🤣🤣🤣🔥

---

Sir, the bureau of international based-ness called for you. They want you for co-chair.

---

Autopilot and Full Self-Driving fraud edit As of October 2022, Tesla is facing a criminal probe from the US Department of Justice over claims it has made about its “Full Self-Driving” driver-assist system or capability.[40][41] Critics call out the company for selling and promoting its so-called Full Self-Driving (FSD) beta add-on when the software requires drivers’ constant supervision and is not actually capable of full self-driving.[42][43] Tesla’s Full Self-Driving beta is generally considered a SAE Level 2 advanced driver-assistance system, similar to competitors’ offerings such as General Motors’ Super Cruise and Ford’s Co-Pilot360.[44] Legal scholars William Widen and Philip Koopman argue that Tesla has misrepresented FSD beta as SAE level 2 in order to “avoid regulatory oversight and permitting processes required of more highly automated vehicles.”[45] They argue that FSD beta should actually be considered a SAE level 4 technology, and have urged state Departments of Transportation in the U.S. to classify it as such, because publicly available videos show that “beta test drivers operate their vehicles as if to validate SAE Level 4 (high driving automation) features, often revealing dramatically risky situations created by use of the vehicles in this manner.”[45] Tesla has benefited from increased sales and profit margins due to sales of the FSD option in particular, priced at $15,000 as of September 2022.[46][47] In April 2019, when Tesla was low on capital, Musk announced that Tesla would have one million robotaxis on the road by the end of 2020; a few weeks later Tesla sold stock to raise an additional $3 billion, solving its cash troubles.[46] Elon Musk has repeatedly claimed that Tesla vehicles will be capable of full autonomy in the near future, but a Freedom of Information Act request made by PlainSite revealed that Tesla told the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) in December 2020 they “do not expect significant enhancements” to the Full Self-Driving software that would enable full self-driving.[43][48] In May 2021, the California DMV said it was investigating whether Tesla violated state regulations by misleading customers in its claims about “full self-driving”.[49] Bryant Walker Smith, an autonomous vehicle law expert at the University of South Carolina, said “it’s so obviously clear that there’s a contradiction” between what Tesla is saying in its marketing of Full Self-Driving versus what its lawyers and engineers have told the DMV.[46] Smith said that using the name Full Self-Driving “leaves the domain of the misleading and irresponsible to something that could be called fraudulent”.[50] In August 2022, records surfaced showing that the California DMV had formally accused Tesla of false advertising Autopilot and FSD in July.[51] In Germany in July 2020, authorities ruled that Tesla misled consumers regarding the “abilities of its automated driving systems” and banned it from using certain marketing language implying autonomous driving capabilities.[52] Upon appeal, that decision was reversed in 2021 by a higher court under the condition that Tesla clarify the capabilities of Autopilot on its website.[53][54] In a 2021 lawsuit against Tesla, Texas police officers claimed “systematic fraud” involving Tesla Autopilot after a Model X crashed into two parked police cars.[55] As of October 2022, a trial has been requested.[56] In September 2022, Tesla was sued by drivers in a proposed class action suit over alleged false advertising of Autopilot and FSD.[57] Insiders revealed to the press in 2022 that the U.S. Department of Justice launched an investigation in 2022 following reports of more than a dozen crashes that involved Autopilot.[58] Then, in a 2023 quarterly company report, Tesla stated receiving subpoenas from the Department in connection with the investigation and other probes.[59]

---

Strategic Bitcoin Reserve renamed to Temporary Bitcoin Purse. David Sacks, co-host of the All-Gone-Podcast, to head office cubicle.

---

its based out of boulder,CO . so most likely a cult.

---

"Pending Orders: WEN $10 Call" That's going to be a great story to share with your co-workers while you flip square burgers

---

never say career break or unemployed in interview just put startup co-founder on your resume tackle any question with "NDA"

---

I have been invested in POET for a while now so let me clear up some of your misconceptions. * “Only matching current bandwidth / negligible R&D” POET’s roadmap targets 800G today with 1.6T in flight, the same lanes and speeds hyperscalers are rolling out. They’ve also disclosed a production order for 800G optical engines. That’s not negligible R\&D; it’s productization at the current top end. * “No one will implement / only 1–2 pilots” They have commercial programs with Luxshare, where POET’s 100G and 200G-per-lane engines are integrated into 400G and 800G modules for AI datacenter networks. The production order referenced above is further evidence of uptake. * “Vertical is squat / can’t compete with their own customers” Their strategy is to sell optical engines and light sources broadly, and only build select, niche modules that don’t compete head-on with module-maker customers. That’s a deliberate channel strategy, not a lack of confidence. * “Financials are small / only flipping assets” Recent financings changed the scale: about US$75M in growth capital followed by an oversubscribed US$150M raise, putting pro-forma cash north of US$300M. The plan is to deploy into acquisitions, R&D scale-up, and light-source acceleration, i.e., building bandwidth products at scale. * “Only a couple pilots → impractical” POET’s Optical Interposer is a packaging and assembly approach that lets conventional components be integrated and scaled. That practicality is why tier-1s like Luxshare and system players like Celestial AI engaged; it drops into existing module designs and emerging AI interconnects. * Blazar, faster targets, and stacking to 3.2T and 6.4T Blazar is POET’s external light-source platform designed for co-packaged optics and chip-to-chip optical links. It decouples the lasers from the hot ASIC, improves manufacturability, and enables higher-radix, higher-bandwidth architectures. Because the Optical Interposer is lane- and wavelength-scalable, you can reach beyond 1.6T by stacking engines and wavelengths. In practice that means ganging multiple 1.6T engines or moving to higher per-lane rates to build 3.2T and eventually 6.4T class modules as the ecosystem moves to 200G-per-lane and beyond. Bottom line: POET is at parity with current hyperscale speeds and pushing into 1.6T, with disclosed production orders, tier-1 partnerships, a light-source strategy built around Blazar that points to much faster architectures, and a clear scaling path to 3.2T and 6.4T as lanes and wavelengths are aggregated. Skepticism on execution is fair, but calling it “just matching bandwidth” with no implementation doesn’t match the latest reality.

---